Consumer
LowCostChecking — fee comparison
A ranked comparison of checking accounts scored on real annual cost, with filters for the fees people actually get hit by and a per-account cost breakdown.
- Role
- Product, scoring model, full-stack build
- Timeline
- TBD
- Status
- Live
- Client
- Consumer product — personal banking comparison
The problem
Comparison pages advertise headline rates and bury the fee schedule. The number that matters — what this account costs someone like me in a year — is never shown.
The approach
One fee score computed from monthly fee, overdraft, minimum balance, and out-of-network usage, applied identically to every account so the ranking is defensible. Filters narrow to real constraints, and each row opens into the schedule behind its score.
The result
One ordered list, one comparable annual cost per account, and a breakdown showing exactly where that number came from.
The stack
Inside the app
Real screens with branding blurred, or reproduced with anonymized data — no client names, logos, or user identities.
Want one of these for your operation?
Tell me the outcome you need. I'll tell you what it takes, what it costs, and whether I'm the right person for it.